Value Masters Academy · Public Assets Series
REPORT NO. 1 · ENGLISH EDITION (EXECUTIVE SUMMARY)
The Cost and Fate of Paying Debt with Debt
A 172-year account of external borrowing from the Ottoman Empire to the Republic of Türkiye (1854–2026): debt stock and interest by year, and the refinancing spiral
Prepared for: H.E. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, President of the Republic of Türkiye · Chairman of the Türkiye Wealth Fund (TVF), and the TVF Board
Prepared by: Value Masters Academy (VMA), part of Value Masters Group
Edition: English executive-summary edition of the full-length Turkish report (September 2026)
Classification: Confidential — for the addressee only
Prepared as an independent analytical study from public sources. It measures the fiscal consequences of resource flows; it contains no view on political choices. Figures marked "≈" are approximate and must be verified before decisions. Not investment advice.

01Executive Summary

539.0$ bn gross external debt, Q2 2026
25.0$ bn external interest 2025 — record
274.6$ bn cumulative external interest 2003–2025
31.8%external debt / GDP (Q2 2026 est.)
100 yrs1854 first loan → 1954 last Ottoman instalment

Türkiye's external debt history begins with a £3 million loan raised in London in 1854 to finance the Crimean War and closes its first, hundred-year cycle on 25 May 1954, when the Republic paid the final instalment of the Ottoman debt. The central finding of this report is that a second and larger cycle opened as soon as the first closed: the legacy debt zeroed in 1954 had become $16 bn by 1980, $130 bn by 2002 and $539 bn of gross external debt by mid-2026.

The size of the stock is misleading on its own. At 31.8% of GDP, external debt is well below the emerging-market average and public debt is around 23% of GDP. Türkiye faces not a "debt crisis" but a cost-of-interest and roll-over-dependency problem:

Thesis: the cost of paying debt with debt is interest; its fate, when interest grows faster than income, is first shorter maturities, then currency risk, and finally a narrowing of sovereignty. Türkiye stands today at the first link (high interest cost); the second (32% short-term, 78% foreign currency) is visible; the third should stay on the table as a historical warning.

02Ottoman Borrowing: From the First Loan to Moratorium (1854–1881)

Source: Blaisdell (1929), Pamuk (2007), VMA compilation. Nominal stock; post-1881 figure is the amount recognised by the Public Debt Administration.

The Ottoman state avoided foreign borrowing until the Crimean War. The first bond (24 August 1854, Palmer & Co./Goldschmidt) — £3 m, 6% coupon, issued at 80, secured on the Egyptian tribute — set the pattern of the next twenty years: nominal 3, received 2.3, interest on the nominal. Between 1854 and 1874 about £212 m nominal was raised at an average issue price near 60; only ≈ £116 m reached the Treasury. The effective cost of a 6% coupon on money actually received was 10–12%. By 1874 debt service (≈ £14 m) absorbed 55–60% of revenue (≈ £22–25 m), and the 1874 loan was explicitly raised to pay interest.

YearLoanNominal £mIssue priceNet £mCouponSecurity / purpose
1854Palmer–Goldschmidt3.0802.36%Egyptian tribute; Crimean War
1855Rothschild (Anglo-French guarantee)5.0102.65.14%Tribute + Smyrna/Syria customs
1858Dent, Palmer5.0763.86%Istanbul customs; paper-money retirement
1862–63Imperial Ottoman Bank (2)16.068–7111.16%Tobacco, salt, stamp duties
1865General Debt + IOB42.450–6622.25–6%Domestic debt consolidation; deficit
1869–70Comptoir d'Escompte; Rumelia Railways (Hirsch)53.932–5422.23–6%Deficit; railway lottery bonds
1871–73IOB; Treasury bill consolidation; Crédit Mobilier44.654–98.530.16–9%Short-term roll-over; deficit
1874General Debt40.043.517.45%Borrowing to pay interest
Total 1854–1874 (≈)≈ 212avg ≈ 60≈ 116avg 5.6%45% of nominal lost on paper

6 October 1875 (Ramazan Decree): half of debt service to be paid in new 5% bonds; within a year cash payments stopped too — de facto default in 1876. The moratorium was not unwillingness to pay but arithmetic: once debt service exceeds 50% of revenue, paying interest with new debt grows the stock 8–10% a year, and each 100 units of interest creates 160–180 units of new nominal debt because of issue discounts.

03The Public Debt Administration (1881–1923): The Cost of Lost Fiscal Sovereignty

The Muharrem Decree (20 December 1881) consolidated 239 m gold lira of nominal debt plus 53 m of arrears into 106.4 m lira at 1–4% interest — a haircut above 55%. In exchange the Ottoman Public Debt Administration was created and the salt and tobacco monopolies, silk tithe, fishing, stamp and spirits duties, the Eastern Rumelia tribute and Cyprus surplus were assigned to it. By 1912 the Administration employed over 5,000 staff — larger than the Finance Ministry — and directly managed silk, salt and tobacco production.

Itemm gold liraNote
Pre-1881 nominal debt239.01854–74 loans + 1875 bonds
Accrued unpaid interest53.01875–81
Consolidated debt, Muharrem Decree106.4> 55% haircut
Revenues assigned to the Administration, 1882 / 1912≈ 2.5 / 3.5 per yr20–30% of state revenue
Collected by the Administration 1882–1914≈ 95Interest + amortisation + costs
New borrowing 1886–1914 (guaranteed by the Administration)≈ 160Baghdad Railway, Hejaz, navy, 1908–14 deficits
External debt stock 1914≈ 160New loans exceeded the consolidated old debt

04From Lausanne to the Last Instalment (1923–1954): The Only Net-Reduction Period

At Lausanne (24 July 1923, Articles 46–57) the Turkish delegation secured apportionment of the Ottoman debt among successor states on a revenue basis: Türkiye assumed 62% of pre-1912 and 67% of post-1912 debt — ≈ 84.6 m gold lira of principal, ≈ 107 m with interest — while Greece, Syria-Lebanon, Iraq, Palestine, Bulgaria, Yugoslavia and others took the remainder (≈ 130 m in total).

PeriodRegimeAnnual (≈)Period total (≈)Note
1923–28Negotiation — no payments——Interest accrual disputed
1929–301928 Paris Agreement, gold lira2.0 m gold lira3.5 mSuspended 1930 after the gold standard collapsed
1933–391933 Paris Agreement, French francs (962 m FF; maturity 1952)45 m FF300 m FF1936 and 1938 franc devaluations cut the real burden
1940–44War; partial paymentvaries150 m FFBalance reduced to 8 m TL in 1944
1945–54Turkish lira instalments0.8 m TL8 m TL25 May 1954: final instalment
Why it worked: (i) no new foreign borrowing between 1923 and 1933 — a deliberate refusal of the "pay debt with debt" reflex; (ii) global monetary disorder (collapse of the gold standard, franc devaluations) used in the borrower's favour. The Republic's first thirty years are the only net-reduction period in 172 years of external debt history.

05The Republic's Own Borrowing: Stock and Interest by Year (1950–2026)

Source: World Bank IDS; Ministry of Treasury and Finance; CBRT. Navy: 2002 and earlier; gold: 2003 onwards. 2024 approximate; 2025 year-end derived from the CBRT Q1 2026 revision.
YearGross external debt $bnPublic shareExternal interest $bnDebt/GDPEvent
19580.90≈95%0.03≈10%First rescheduling; 69% devaluation
19702.3≈90%0.08≈13%Devaluation; convertible FX deposits begin
197814.9≈70%0.7≈22%Payment difficulties; second rescheduling
198016.2≈75%1.127%24 January decisions; 33% devaluation
199049.4≈70%3.332%Capital account liberalised (1989)
199465.6≈65%3.950%April crisis; short-term outflows
2001113.6≈55%7.158%February crisis; IMF 19th Stand-by
2002130.3≈55%6.056%Transition to a Strong Economy programme
2008281.128%10.937%Global crisis
2013389.530%9.741%Investment grade (briefly)
2018427.233%13.656%Currency shock
2020436.339%12.260%Pandemic; reserve erosion
2023499.941%18.345%Return to orthodox policy
2025≈520.5≈38%25.0≈35%Record external interest
2026 Q2539.037%—31.8% (est.)Short-term 170.7; long-term 368.2; 49% USD, 29% EUR, 12% TL
Source: World Bank IDS; Treasury/CBRT balance of payments; CHP Parliamentary Group Economic Report (Feb 2026) for 2021–2025. Cumulative 2003–2025: $274.6 bn ($121 bn public + CBRT; $154 bn private).

Three reschedulings, three lessons. 1958: external debt cannot grow faster than export capacity. 1978–80: private FX debt taken through banks became Treasury debt when the exchange rate was held — the most important warning for today's $318 bn of private external debt. 2001: when interest exceeds tax revenue (103% in 2001) the market closes the cycle by force.

06The Arithmetic of Paying Debt with Debt

Source: VMA calculation; CBRT, Treasury. Stock increase: $130.3 bn → $520.5 bn.
Parameter1854–74 Ottoman1990–20012018–232024–26
Effective borrowing cost (r)10–12% (gold)8–10% ($) / 90%+ (TL)5–7% ($)6–8% ($)
Income growth (g, same currency)2–3%3–4%0–2%8–12% (real appreciation)
r – g+8–9 pts+5 pts+4–5 pts–2 to –4 pts
Interest / government revenue55–60%77–103%9–11%11–15%
Average maturityShorteningShorteningShortening (34% short)Flat (32%)
Outcome1875 moratorium2001 crisis + IMF2021–23 currency shockFragile stability

Opportunity cost. The $66 bn of external interest paid in 2023–2025 is more than twice the net FDI received in the same three years (≈ $30 bn): the country pays more to retain capital than it attracts. Maturity is the silent signal. Every historical break was preceded by shortening maturities about three years earlier. With ≈ $220 bn due within twelve months against gross reserves of ≈ $180 bn (net far lower), roll-over capacity depends entirely on uninterrupted market access — exactly what closed in 1875 and 2001.

07Strategic Options and the Role of the Türkiye Wealth Fund

Source: World Bank, CBRT, Treasury; VMA calculation. 2026 is the Ministry's Q2 estimate.
LeverMechanismPrecedentScaleRisk
1. Lower the risk premiumBB+ → BBB− cuts new-issue margins 150–250 bpTürkiye 2005–12; 2013 investment grade$3–5 bn/yr on $221 bn rolled annuallyGains evaporate on programme slippage
2. Extend maturity, manage currencyShort-term share 32% → 25%; TL share of external debt 12% → 20%Treasury 2004–07 extensionCuts 12-month due amount by $40–50 bnLonger tenor costs more up front
3. Reduce debt from the asset side (TVF)Partial IPOs / strategic stakes in low-yield TVF assets; proceeds to Eurobond buybacksTemasek, Khazanah debt-asset swapsEach $10 bn retired ≈ $0.6–0.8 bn/yr savedPricing; perception; strategic control
4. Primary surplus and current accountCurrent deficit below 1% of GDP cuts financing need $30–35 bn/yr2001–04 6.5% primary-surplus programmeBreaks roll-over dependency structurallyGrowth and political cost

Specific recommendations for TVF

  1. Debt-for-asset swap programme: gradual monetisation of TVF assets yielding below the sovereign cost, proceeds to Eurobond buybacks; 20–25% of the $8.4 bn public+CBRT external interest could be eliminated within five years.
  2. Consolidated public balance sheet: report TVF assets and Treasury external debt as one net public position so agencies rate net rather than gross debt — the cheapest path to an upgrade.
  3. Contingent-liability monitoring: joint TVF/Treasury stress test of the $318 bn private external debt, pricing the segment likely to be nationalised in a currency shock (energy and infrastructure PPPs with guaranteed FX revenues).
  4. Domestic savings channel: long-dated TL bonds issued by TVF subsidiaries to raise the TL share of external debt, lengthen maturities and cut currency risk.
Closing: the first cycle (1854–1954) ended in lost sovereignty not because of debt but because paying interest with debt became a habit. The second cycle opened in 1958 and stands at $539 bn and $25 bn of annual interest. The two principles that closed the first cycle — reducing debt without new borrowing and using global conditions in the borrower's favour — still apply. What is new is that the asset side (TVF) and the liability side can now be managed at the same table.

Sources

CBRT External Debt Statistics Q1–Q2 2026 and remaining-maturity short-term debt; Ministry of Treasury and Finance Public Debt Management Reports and Financing Programmes; World Bank International Debt Statistics (DT.DOD.DECT.CD, DT.INT.DECT.CD); Blaisdell, European Financial Control in the Ottoman Empire (1929); Kıray (1993); Pamuk (2007, 2014); Clay, Gold for the Sultan (2000); Birdal (2010); Treaty of Lausanne Part II; 1928 and 1933 Paris Agreements. Pre-1980 interest figures are estimates; 2024–25 year-end stocks are derived from CBRT quarterly revisions and marked "≈".